Capacity expansion and resource adequacy are linked processes; however, the interactions between them are often greatly simplified in long-term planning. Furthermore, capacity value methodologies used to date are often either oversimplified (for example, average generation during on-peak hours) or complex to implement (for example, Effective Load Carrying Capability calculations). This work bridges the gap between the two long-term planning processes by evaluating several capacity valuation methodologies. Bridging the gap between these two types of assessments has the potential to generate more resilient and cost-effective generation portfolios.